Thursday, August 18, 2011

Women are not children

Did you know that in Oregon, an ex-spouse can be forced to pay the other ex-spouse alimony for life?  Although the statute refers to "indefinite" alimony, what that really means is that if the payor needs a modification, he or she (and let's be honest and refer to the payor as "he") must hire a lawyer and take his former spouse to court.  That costs money - a lot of money - and there are no guarantees he will obtain a reduction or elimination.

Compare this system with our child support system.  When you bring a child into the world, you are only legally obligated to support that child until they reach the age of majority or otherwise become emancipated.  There is an end to the expectation of financial support (although many of us parents would admit we would continue to aid our children no matter what their age if they needed it).

Therefore, if a couple divorces and the stay-at-home spouse who has made a life choice not to work for 30 years is 54 years old, the working spouse will likely have to support her for several decades, depending upon her life expectancy.  There is a common misunderstanding that alimony ends if the payee remarries.  This is really not true unless the payee remarries someone with a larger income than the payor.  In addition, what motivation would the payee have to remarry, given the unearned money coming in from the ex every month?

Long-term alimony creates a dependent, weak and unmotivated recipient and a resentful payor, which does nothing to help the ongoing family dynamic to the extent they both wish one to exist, most especially when children are involved.

So ladies, are we independent and able to take care of ourselves, or are we little more than children - children who are never even expected under current family laws to grow up and be on our own?


Sunday, August 14, 2011

Getting started

After five years of considering the issue (I move very quickly, you see) I have decided to emulate my friends in Massachusettes and fight the battle against arcane alimony laws. I won't be referring the the matter at hand in the newer term "spousal support," because it is not spousal support. It is financial support of an ex spouse, and the practice is rooted in long-outdated theories of paternalism and low expectations of women.

I will be posting more tomorrow, including a description of what one small, grassroots group was able to accomplish in Massachusettes. They have inspired me, and I hope to pick up the torch here in Oregon. It is surprising that such a liberal state has codified the indentured servitude of (almost exclusively) men while simultaneously promoting a decidedly non-feminist view of women.  I'm still trying to find my way, so bear with me.

Part of this blog will be an examination of particular stories shared with me on the horrors of alimony.  If you have stories to share, please email them to alimony.reform.oregon@gmail.com.  I will not use your name (unless you want me to).  I have also started a twitter feed: twitter.com/oralimonyreform

More tomorrow.  Happy Sunday!!